🔍 Read the full analysis: IT Staff Augmentation Vs Full-Time Hiring: How To Find The Break-Even Rate on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get movie nights delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
A November 6 analysis from ThorstenMeyerAI.com calculates the hourly cost of full-time developers using public labor data, then adds recruiting and utilization assumptions to estimate when staff augmentation costs less. Its US example moves from about $98 per hour at full utilization to about $197 when a hire is needed only half the time; Germany’s sector-wide information and communication figure is €58.50 per hour worked.
Thorsten Meyer published a calculation on November 6 for comparing staff augmentation with full-time developer hiring, using public employer-cost data from the United States and Germany. The analysis estimates a US median developer costs an employer about $95 per hour actually worked before recruiting costs, and shows how the break-even rate rises when a company cannot keep a hire fully utilized.
The calculation defines the break-even rate as the highest hourly price for an outside specialist at which augmentation costs no more than hiring for the work in question. Meyer says he used public figures rather than agency price surveys, which he says lack sufficiently clear methods for comparison. Readers are meant to insert the quotes and workload assumptions relevant to their own case.
For the US example, Meyer combines a $135,980 median annual software developer wage from May 2025 Bureau of Labor Statistics data with employer-cost figures for professional occupations. The BLS reported that employers in that group paid $78.88 per hour worked, including wages and benefits. Applying a roughly 28% benefit load to the developer wage and estimating about 1,830 hours actually worked in a year produces an employer cost of approximately $95 per hour worked, according to Meyer’s calculation.
He then adds recruiting expense. A 2025 SHRM benchmark cited in the analysis gives an average $5,475 cost per non-executive hire, while its median is $1,200. Assuming a one-year stay and using the average, Meyer estimates recruiting adds about $3 per hour, taking the US figure to roughly $98 per hour. The analysis says the same hiring cost spread over three years produces about $96 per hour. These estimates depend on the selected benchmark and tenure assumption.
Infographic 01 · The true cost of a hire
A salary is not the cost
Before you compare a hire with an outside specialist, convert both into the same unit: cost per hour of real work.
What a median US software developer costs the employer per hour actually worked. Our calculation from BLS wage and employer-cost data.
From salary to hourly cost
Calculation, each input published by the BLS
- Median salary, US software developer (May 2025)$135,980
- × 1.28 employer costs on top (benefits, insurance, retirement, payroll taxes)$174,600
- ÷ hours actually worked (2,080 paid, about 12% paid leave)1,830 h
- Cost per hour actually worked≈ $95
Sources: BLS Employer Costs for Employee Compensation, June 2026, Table 4 · BLS median wage, software developers, May 2025 · Destatis, 29 Apr 2026 · Destatis non-wage labour costs · SHRM 2025 benchmarking. Load factor = total compensation ÷ (wages + paid leave) = $78.88 ÷ $61.43. German sector figure covers all jobs in the sector, not only developers.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
How Utilization Changes the Price
The main practical finding is that workload utilization can matter more than recruiting fees. If a company has useful work for only half of a new hire’s working hours, Meyer’s example puts the cost per productive hour at about $197, compared with roughly $98 when the employee is fully occupied. The calculation reflects the same annual employee cost spread across fewer productive hours; it is not a quoted market rate for an agency or contractor.
That distinction helps explain why a simple comparison of salary with an hourly contractor quote can mislead. A full-time employee also brings benefits, paid leave and recruiting costs, while an external specialist is usually engaged only for the hours or project required. Conversely, a high augmentation rate may be less expensive than carrying an underused employee, but the analysis does not establish a universal rate at which one option wins.
Meyer’s framework points to different considerations beyond the spreadsheet. Short-duration, uncertain or specialist work may fit augmentation, while sustained core work and knowledge a business needs to retain may favor hiring. Those are decision factors presented in the analysis, not measured outcomes from a comparative study.
Popular right now
Breville BES870XL Barista Express Espresso Machine
Roborock Q7 M5+ Robot Vacuum and Mop with Self-Emptying Dock
Dyson Car+Boat Cordless Handheld Vacuum
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Two Country Cost Benchmarks
The US and German figures use different statistical measures, so they are starting points rather than direct salary comparisons. For June 2026, the BLS reported average private-industry employer costs of $46.89 per hour worked, including $32.82 in wages and $14.07 in benefits. For the broader management, professional and related occupational group, it reported $78.88 per hour worked. Meyer uses that group’s benefit relationship to estimate the loaded cost of a median software developer.
For Germany, Destatis reported that non-wage labor costs were €29 per €100 of gross earnings in 2025. The average cost of an hour worked in the information and communication sector was €58.50, up from €49 in 2020. That is a sector average across IT and telecommunications jobs, not a developer-only figure. Meyer describes it as comparable in broad purpose to the US cost-per-hour estimate, while noting the occupational difference.
The analysis also cites SHRM’s 2025 survey of 2,371 member organizations. Its $5,475 average hiring cost covers non-executive roles across occupations and includes items such as recruiting staff, job advertising, referral bonuses and relocation. It is not a technology-specific recruiting estimate, and the much lower $1,200 median reflects the difference between the median and average in that survey.
“The break-even rate, the highest hourly rate an outside specialist can cost before hiring becomes the cheaper option.”
— Thorsten Meyer, ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Inputs That Can Change the Result
The figures are illustrative calculations, not a universal break-even quote. The US estimate combines a developer’s median wage with employer-cost data for a wider professional group, while Germany’s €58.50 figure covers an entire information and communication sector. Pay, benefits, location, seniority, taxes, employee tenure and the actual amount of productive work can all change an employer’s result.
The recruiting estimate also has limits: SHRM’s figure covers non-executive roles broadly, not technology hiring alone, and the calculation assumes a one-year stay when estimating its hourly contribution. Meyer’s supplied material begins to describe the utilization calculation but does not provide a complete set of assumptions for every scenario. It is not clear how the examples account for equipment, management time, onboarding, contractor administration or differences in output and quality.
The analysis says evidence on how much coding agents increase developer speed remains unsettled. It does not quantify an AI productivity adjustment or report a controlled comparison of hiring and augmentation. Its conclusions should be treated as a repeatable costing method, not proof that one staffing model is cheaper in every case.
Apply the Formula to Local Quotes
The next step for a business using the method is to calculate its own annual employee cost, estimate productive hours rather than paid hours, include recruiting and other relevant expenses, and compare the resulting hourly figure with actual augmentation quotes. The assumptions should be stated explicitly, especially expected tenure and how much work the role will have.
For any later update to the comparison, employers would need current wage and benefit data, recruiting benchmarks suited to their roles, and credible evidence on how AI tools affect the specific work being staffed. The source article provides no announced follow-up study or new market-rate survey.
Key Questions
What does break-even rate mean in this analysis?
It is the maximum hourly rate for an outside specialist at which staff augmentation would cost no more than hiring for the work, given the employer’s assumptions about pay, benefits, recruiting and productive hours.
What is the US example’s estimated cost per hour?
Meyer estimates about $95 per hour actually worked for a median-wage US software developer before recruiting costs. Adding the cited average hiring cost under a one-year tenure assumption brings the estimate to about $98.
Why does the estimate nearly double at 50% utilization?
The annual cost of the employee is spread across fewer useful hours. In Meyer’s example, needing the hire for only half of their working time raises the estimated cost per useful hour from about $98 to about $197.
Can the German and US figures be compared directly?
Not as like-for-like developer pay benchmarks. The German €58.50 per hour is an average for the information and communication sector, while the US calculation estimates the cost of a median software developer using broader professional employer-cost data.
Does the analysis show that staff augmentation is always cheaper?
No. It gives a method for comparing costs and says the result depends especially on utilization, duration and the need to retain knowledge. It does not provide universal contractor rates or prove that one staffing model is cheaper in all situations.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
