🔍 Read the full analysis: My View: Nvidia Would Make A Huge Mistake By Letting Jensen Huang Go on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get movie nights delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
Thorsten Meyer’s November 13 opinion piece argues Nvidia would make a serious mistake by letting CEO Jensen Huang go, comparing the idea to Apple losing Steve Jobs. The article does not establish that Nvidia is considering his departure; it presents Meyer’s view amid what he describes as speculation and a difficult family moment.
Thorsten Meyer argued in a November 13 opinion piece that Nvidia would make a major mistake by letting CEO Jensen Huang go, saying the consequences could extend beyond the company to the United States and the future of artificial intelligence. The article does not report a confirmed decision by Nvidia to remove Huang or say that the company is preparing to do so.
Meyer frames his argument as a personal view, not a report of a board decision or a confirmed change in leadership. He compares a possible loss of Huang to Apple firing Steve Jobs, while arguing that Huang’s role at the head of a company central to AI makes the stakes greater. That comparison is Meyer’s assessment, not an established measure of the potential impact.
The author says he had been quiet out of respect for Huang’s family and team during what he describes as a difficult personal family moment. Meyer also writes that Huang is human and makes mistakes. The piece does not specify the circumstances behind the family matter or identify a particular company action that might follow from it.
To support his positive view of Huang’s character, Meyer recounts encounters in which he says Huang treated people thoughtfully, including strangers and people from struggling communities. He also says that, over the years, more than a thousand people who know Huang—including engineers, executives, colleagues and friends—have spoken positively about him privately. Those accounts are Meyer’s recollection; the article does not name the people or independently document their views.
What happened · Nvidia, Nov 8 to Nov 12
From a board investigation to an interim CEO
The steps, in Nvidia’s own words and one attributed report.
- Nov 8Nvidia boardOpens an independent investigation “in light of recent reporting” that the CEO “has been the target of a foreign intelligence effort”; sees “no reason to believe” secrets were compromised
- Nov 11ReportedThe Wall Street Journal reports the board is preparing to oust Huang, according to CNBC. The same day, the board accepts his resignation, according to Nvidia’s 8-K
- Nov 12NvidiaAnnounces that Jensen Huang “has resigned as President, Chief Executive Officer, and a member of the Board, effective immediately”
- Nov 12New leadershipCFO Colette Kress is interim CEO and stays CFO; Harvey C. Jones becomes the board’s “first-ever Chair”; the search for a permanent CEO begins
Sources: Nvidia Newsroom, “Statement From NVIDIA Board of Directors” (Nov 8, 2026) and “NVIDIA Announces CEO Transition” (Nov 12, 2026); Nvidia Form 8-K, filed Nov 12, 2026 (SEC EDGAR); CNBC live updates, Nov 11, 2026, citing The Wall Street Journal.
Graphic: Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Leadership and Nvidia’s AI Role
The argument matters because it links Nvidia’s leadership to a broader debate over the company’s place in AI. Nvidia’s business has made Huang a highly visible figure in the industry, and a change at the top could draw attention from employees, investors and technology customers. But this opinion piece does not establish that such a change is planned, nor does it quantify what a departure would mean for Nvidia’s operations or the wider AI market.
Meyer’s central point is that keeping Huang would matter not only for Nvidia but also for the United States’ position in AI development. That is an argument about potential consequences, rather than a verified assessment of policy or economic effects. Readers should distinguish the author’s advocacy from confirmed information about the company’s leadership.
Popular right now
Vitamix 5200 Blender with 64 oz Container, Black
Dyson V15 Detect Cordless Vacuum
KitchenAid 3-Piece Pasta Roller and Cutter Set for Stand Mixers
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What Meyer Says About Huang
The piece is explicitly labeled opinion and identifies its views as Meyer’s own. Its main case combines the Jobs comparison with Meyer’s personal observations of Huang and reports of favorable private comments from people he says know the CEO. It does not provide named testimonials, direct quotations from those people, or evidence that Nvidia’s board has discussed a leadership change.
Meyer also addresses what he calls “spy talk,” stating that Huang is proud to be American. The article does not set out the underlying allegations or provide evidence relating to them, so that remark should be understood as the author’s response rather than a substantiated finding about any investigation. Related-reading headlines listed in the article refer to Huang resigning and a spy probe, but the opinion piece itself does not verify those developments. It says its “What happened” box and animated timeline were researched and drafted with AI assistance, including Anthropic’s Claude, and that no company named in the article reviewed or sponsored it.
“NVIDIA letting Jensen go is a huge mistake, for America and for humanity.”
— Thorsten Meyer, ThorstenMeyerAI.com
No Departure Is Confirmed
The article does not establish that Nvidia has decided to remove Huang, that Huang has resigned, or that the board is weighing a succession plan. It provides no statement from Nvidia and no direct account from Huang. The nature of the personal family situation Meyer refers to is also not detailed, and the piece does not substantiate the “spy talk” it mentions. Those points remain unverified within the article and should not be treated as confirmed developments.
Watch for Company Statements
The next meaningful development would be a direct statement from Nvidia or Huang addressing his role, or independently reported information about any board or succession discussions. Until such information is available, Meyer’s piece is best read as an argument for retaining Huang—not evidence that Nvidia plans to let him go. The article also says it is for information only and is not investment advice.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Key Questions
Has Nvidia confirmed that Jensen Huang is leaving?
No. Meyer’s opinion piece does not report a confirmed resignation or a decision by Nvidia to remove Huang.
What is Thorsten Meyer arguing?
Meyer argues that Nvidia would make a serious mistake by letting Huang go and says the consequences could matter to the United States and AI development. That is his opinion, not a confirmed company position.
Why does Meyer compare Huang to Steve Jobs?
He uses Apple’s loss of Jobs as an analogy for the possible cost of losing a prominent company leader. The comparison reflects Meyer’s judgment; the article does not establish that the situations are equivalent.
What does the article say about reports involving a spy probe?
Meyer refers to “spy talk” and says Huang is proud to be American, but the article does not detail or substantiate the underlying claims. It does not establish the status or findings of an investigation.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
