🔍 Read the full analysis: 52 Companies Mention Humanoid Robots In SEC Filings: Read The Fine Print on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get movie nights delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
ThorstenMeyerAI.com says its review of SEC EDGAR filings found 52 companies mentioning “humanoid” in 163 filings from Jan. 1 to Nov. 1, 2026. The outlet classified only nine as builders, sellers or owners of a humanoid maker; many others were suppliers, prospective customers, blank-check companies or incidental mentions. The count measures references in filings, not robot deployments or revenue.
ThorstenMeyerAI.com says it found 52 companies mentioning humanoid robots in 163 SEC filings submitted from Jan. 1 through Nov. 1, 2026. The tally is a measure of how often the term appeared in selected public filings—not a count of companies operating robots—and the outlet’s review found that only nine companies build, sell or own a humanoid maker.
The outlet says it searched the SEC’s EDGAR full-text system for “humanoid” in 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K and S-1 filings, including amendments and exhibits. It counted one company per SEC registrant number and one filing per accession number. The search returned 186 matching documents across 163 filings; Faraday Future accounted for 35 filings. Searching all form types produced a much larger count, the outlet said, largely because investment funds’ holdings lists included humanoid-robotics funds.
For comparison, the same search method found 17 companies in 2025 and six in 2024. The report says Inc. had counted 47 companies in a Nov. 1 column, using a count that differed in form types and date window. The two totals are not identical measures, and the outlet says its own count was conducted independently after seeing the column.
After reading the surrounding text, ThorstenMeyerAI.com classified 31 companies as suppliers, customers or market observers, six as blank-check companies, and six as mentioning the term in passing. Examples include chipmakers and materials suppliers describing humanoids as a possible market, as well as companies discussing potential customer uses. The classifications are the outlet’s interpretation of the filings, not an SEC designation.
Infographic 01 · The word is spreading
52 companies said “humanoid” in SEC filings this year
We ran the search ourselves: three times as many companies as in all of 2025, and almost nine times as many as in 2024.
Companies mentioning “humanoid”
10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, S-1 incl. amendments and exhibits, by filing year (2026: to 1 Nov)
The blockchain wave
Companies mentioning “blockchain” in the same forms
Mentions did not fall after the 2018 crypto crash. A rising count alone is not a bubble signal; the gap between words and business is.
How we counted
- Query: humanoid (catches “robot”, “robots”, “robotics”). The exact phrase “humanoid robot” alone: 18 companies.
- Forms: 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, S-1, each with amendments; every matching document, including exhibits.
- Period: filing dates 1 Jan to 1 Nov 2026; earlier years by calendar year.
- Counting: one company per SEC registrant number (CIK). Faraday Future alone: 35 of 163 filings.
- Inc. reported 47 companies. Likely a different form set or date window; same direction.
Source: SEC EDGAR full-text search, run 2 Nov 2026 (an all-forms search finds 272 entities, mostly investment funds listing humanoid-robotics ETFs; excluded). Tip: Inc., 1 Nov 2026.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
What the Filing Count Can Show
The tally shows that humanoid robotics has entered corporate disclosure language across a range of industries. That can help investors and readers identify companies positioning themselves around the sector, but it does not establish that those companies have products in production, paying customers or material robot-related sales.
The difference matters because a filing mention can describe very different things: a company’s own robot program, a supplier’s prospective market, a customer’s investment, a proposed acquisition or simply a reference in a biography. Treating all 52 as robot makers would overstate what the filings establish. The source’s more detailed classification is useful as a guide to what to read next, but it remains its own analysis.
The article also points to operating and revenue figures as a counterweight to broad market language. It says Agility Robotics reports nine customer facilities and 65,000 operating hours. Those are company-reported figures cited by the source, not independently verified results in this material. For readers weighing claims about adoption, specific deployments and disclosed revenue carry different evidentiary weight from a mention of market opportunity.
Popular right now
LG 85-Inch QNED73B Mini LED 4K Smart TV (2026)
Jura E6 Automatic Espresso Machine, Piano Black (15622)
Ninja CREAMi 7-in-1 Ice Cream Maker, NC301
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the Count Was Compiled
The report says its search used the word “humanoid”, rather than only the exact phrase “humanoid robot.” According to the outlet, an exact-phrase search found 18 companies in 2026, because it does not capture every use of variants such as “humanoid robots” or “humanoid robotics.” Its principal comparison is limited to filings submitted between Jan. 1 and Nov. 1, 2026, and the same selected form types in earlier years.
The companies named in the report span several types of exposure. The nine it says build, sell or own a humanoid maker include Tesla, Faraday Future, Mobileye and Intel, as well as Richtech Robotics, Onconetix, Hyperscale Data and SS Innovations. The article says Mobileye bought Mentee Robotics for $637 million, while Intel reports the deal. The report also describes six blank-check companies, including Churchill Capital Corp XI, which it says is merging with Agility Robotics.
Other references are more indirect. The source identifies chipmakers such as Micron, SiTime and Diodes as listing humanoids among potential growth markets, and says logistics company GXO discusses investment in humanoids while warning that they may not produce returns. A supplier, Vishay Precision, reported a vendor nomination letter from an initial humanoid-robotics customer, according to the article. That is a concrete commercial step, but the source does not say it establishes substantial sales.
“A word in a filing is not a robot in a warehouse.”
— ThorstenMeyerAI.com
What Mentions Do Not Establish
The filing count does not establish how many companies have working humanoid robots, commercial contracts or meaningful revenue. The source gives examples of disclosures but does not provide a complete, independently verified accounting of deployments or sales for all 52 companies. Its categories also depend on how it interpreted each mention.
The material provided does not include the full filing-by-filing detail for every company or the underlying search results, so readers cannot assess each classification from this account alone. Some claims cited in the report—including company figures on facilities, operating hours, shipments and revenue—are attributed to companies or their filings and should not be treated as independently confirmed here.
The supplied source also refers to detailed examples involving Faraday Future and other filings but cuts off before presenting all of those accounts. It says Faraday Future’s robotics revenue was $853,000 in the second quarter, combining humanoids and four-legged robots, and contrasts that with a prospectus that reported two paid orders worth about $5,000 for its robot-sharing platform. The time periods and business definitions differ, and the provided material does not explain whether the figures cover the same activity. It also says the company that bought the robot business expects more than 1,100 cumulative shipments; the basis, timing and status of that projection are not specified here.
What Readers Can Check Next
The next step for readers is to examine the underlying SEC filings for the companies of interest, especially the sections on revenue, customers, contracts, risk factors and capital spending. A filing’s exact wording can show whether a company reports an existing product or merely identifies humanoids as a possible market.
Future filings may clarify whether announced acquisitions, customer nominations and proposed mergers lead to completed transactions, deliveries or recurring revenue. The current count covers submissions only through Nov. 1, 2026, so later filings are outside its stated window. ThorstenMeyerAI.com presents the tally as a reading of public documents, not an assessment of any stock or a forecast for the sector.
Key Questions
How many companies mentioned humanoids in the 2026 SEC filings reviewed?
ThorstenMeyerAI.com counted 52 companies in filings dated Jan. 1 through Nov. 1, 2026. Its search covered specified SEC form types and amendments.
Does the count mean 52 companies are making humanoid robots?
No. The outlet classified nine as builders, sellers or owners of a humanoid maker. It placed the others in supplier, customer, blank-check or incidental categories.
How many filings were included?
The search found 163 filings containing 186 matching documents, according to the report. One company, Faraday Future, accounted for 35 filings.
Why is the count different from Inc.’s figure?
Inc. reported 47 companies on Nov. 1. ThorstenMeyerAI.com says differences in form types and the date window likely explain the gap; the totals do not use identical parameters.
What does a mention in an SEC filing prove?
By itself, it proves only that the term appeared in the filing. It does not establish deployment, customer demand or revenue; those claims require supporting details in the company’s disclosures.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
