Among these rated WiFi smart locks, I rank the Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt as the best overall because it offers the strongest balance of connected access, familiar keypad operation, and established deadbolt design. The eufy Security Smart Lock C220 stands out for fingerprint entry, while the Philips model with two handles makes more sense when matching door hardware matters. The main choices are whether to prioritize remote access, fast biometric entry, conventional keyed backup, or a coordinated handle package. Price also rises when buyers want stronger materials, more access methods, or broader hardware bundles. Continue reading for the full ranking logic, buying factors, and recommendations by buyer type.
Get movie nights delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Key Takeaways
- Schlage Encode ranks first because its combination of built-in WiFi, keypad access, keyed backup, and conventional deadbolt design suits the widest range of households.
- Wyze Bolt v2 is the value pick, but buyers should weigh its lower entry cost against a less established lock-hardware reputation than Schlage or Yale.
- eufy C220 offers the strongest fingerprint-focused proposition, making it more appealing than keypad-first models for frequent family entry.
- The three Philips options serve different installation scopes: a basic deadbolt replacement, a single-door lock-and-handle package, and a broader two-handle bundle.
- WiFi convenience carries a battery tradeoff; buyers who use frequent remote checks, alerts, and motorized locking should expect more maintenance than with a basic electronic deadbolt.
| Yale WiFi Smart Lock Deadbolt with Keypad, Keyless Entry, Black Suede |  | Best Overall for Versatile Security and Convenience | Connectivity: Wi-Fi (2.4 & 5 GHz) | Control: Smartphone, Apple Watch | Grade: Grade 2 (BHMA) | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Century Trim, Matte Black |  | Best for Secure, Voice-Enabled Control without Hardwiring | Material: Matte Black finish | Connectivity: WiFi | Power: 4 AA batteries | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock, Keyless Entry Door Lock |  | Best for Multi-Method Access and Customization | Connectivity: Wi-Fi 2.4GHz | Control Methods: App, passcode, fingerprint, voice, key | Auto-Lock Timer: 10-180 seconds | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with 2 Handles and Keypad |  | Best for Multi-Handle and All-in-One Access | Included Components: 2 door handles, batteries, hardware, WiFi module | Connectivity: Wi-Fi | Control Methods: App, fingerprint, PIN, key | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| eufy Security Smart Lock C220, Fingerprint Keyless Entry Door Lock |  | Best for Long-Lasting Battery and Smart Ecosystem Integration | Battery Life: 8 months | Unlock Methods: Fingerprint, keypad, app, voice, key | Wi-Fi: Built-in, no bridge | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint Keyless Entry Smart Lock |  | Best for Fast, AI-Enhanced Fingerprint Recognition | Battery Life: 8 months | Battery Type: 8 AA batteries | Connectivity: Wi-Fi | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle, Built-in WiFi, App Remote Control |  | Best for DIY Installers and Multi-Method Access | Connectivity: WiFi 2.4GHz, no hub needed | Auto-Lock: Yes, customizable 0-180 seconds | Battery Life: Up to 6 months | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| rated wifi smart lock | Connectivity | Battery Life |
|---|---|---|
| Yale WiFi Smart Lock Deadbolt | Wi-Fi (2.4 & 5 GHz) | — |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Dead | WiFi | Up to 6 months |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | Wi-Fi 2.4GHz | — |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | Wi-Fi | — |
| eufy Security Smart Lock C220 | — | 8 months |
| Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Fingerp | Wi-Fi | 8 months |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt w | WiFi 2.4GHz, no hub needed | Up to 6 months |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Yale WiFi Smart Lock Deadbolt with Keypad, Keyless Entry, Black Suede
This Yale model stands out for its seamless integration of keyless entry, remote control, and auto-lock features, making it highly adaptable for most standard doors. Compared to the Schlage Encode, it offers more flexible user management with unlimited codes, but it relies heavily on Wi-Fi, which could pose issues during connectivity outages. Its compatibility with Apple Watch and real-time alerts enhances security and ease of access, yet battery life can demand frequent attention, especially with intensive use. This lock is ideal for homeowners seeking a dependable, feature-rich system that balances convenience with security, though those in areas with unstable Wi-Fi might face occasional frustrations.
Pros:- Easy remote control and real-time alerts via app
- Keyless entry with unlimited user codes
- Auto-Unlock and DoorSense features for convenience
Cons:- Requires Wi-Fi connection for full functionality
- Battery life may require regular monitoring
Best for: Homeowners needing a reliable, feature-rich lock with broad compatibility and remote access options.
Not ideal for: Users with inconsistent Wi-Fi connections or who prioritize long-term battery life over advanced features.
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi (2.4 & 5 GHz)
- Control:Smartphone, Apple Watch
- Grade:Grade 2 (BHMA)
- Temperature Range:-22°F to 140°F
- Door Compatibility:1-3/4″ to 2-1/4″ thick doors
- Backup Key:Included
Our verdict“This lock suits those who want a versatile, app-controlled deadbolt with comprehensive features for everyday convenience.”
Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Century Trim, Matte Black
The Schlage Encode excels in security and ease of installation, supporting voice commands via Alexa and Google Home, which makes hands-free access straightforward. It compares favorably to the Yale in battery efficiency, with up to 6 months per set of batteries, but its reliance on Wi-Fi means frequent battery replacements may be necessary if used heavily. Its high security, backed by encryption and alarms, makes it ideal for safety-conscious users, though it is limited to standard door sizes and may not suit custom or thicker doors. This model is well-suited for users who value security and voice integration and prefer a straightforward, non-hardwired setup.
Pros:- Remote control and monitoring via WiFi and app
- Supports Alexa and Google voice commands
- Easy installation without hardwiring
Cons:- Battery life may require frequent replacement
- Requires WiFi for remote features
Best for: Homeowners seeking a secure, easy-to-install lock with voice control and remote monitoring.
Not ideal for: Those with custom-sized or thicker doors, or who prefer a lock with longer battery life or no Wi-Fi dependency.
- Material:Matte Black finish
- Connectivity:WiFi
- Power:4 AA batteries
- Battery Life:Up to 6 months
- Door Thickness:1-3/8 in to 1-3/4 in
- Backset:2-3/8 in or 2-3/4 in
Our verdict“This lock offers a secure, voice-compatible solution ideal for users who want simple installation and remote control features.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock, Keyless Entry Door Lock
This Philips model provides a broad array of unlocking options, from app control and passcodes to fingerprint and voice commands, making it highly flexible. Its compatibility with Alexa and Google simplifies smart home integration, and the remote control range of 65 feet ensures convenience. Compared to the Schlage, it offers more unlocking methods, but it does not include a door sensor, potentially limiting its ability to alert you if the door is left open. Its DIY installation makes it accessible, though the need for batteries and Wi-Fi dependency can be drawbacks. It makes the most sense for tech-savvy users who desire multiple access options without complex wiring.
Pros:- Multiple unlocking options including app, fingerprint, passcode, and voice
- Remote access and real-time notifications
- Easy DIY installation for most standard doors
Cons:- Requires 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, no support for 5GHz
- No door open/close sensor for additional security
Best for: Tech-savvy homeowners wanting flexible, multi-method entry options with remote control capabilities.
Not ideal for: Users who prefer automatic locking or have limited Wi-Fi stability, as it lacks a door sensor and auto-lock feature.
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi 2.4GHz
- Control Methods:App, passcode, fingerprint, voice, key
- Auto-Lock Timer:10-180 seconds
- Power:AA batteries (not included)
- Compatibility:Doors 1-3/8″ to 2″
Our verdict“Ideal for users seeking maximum flexibility in unlocking methods and remote control, with a straightforward installation process.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with 2 Handles and Keypad
This Philips bundle provides two lever handles along with multiple unlocking options, including fingerprint, PIN, key, and app control. It stands out for its comprehensive package, making it suitable for dual-entry points or extra security. Compared to single-handle models like the Yale, it offers more customization for different entryways, but its auto-lock feature requires the door to be fully closed, which can lead to security gaps if overlooked. Installation involves drilling and optional extra security screws, and it depends on 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, similar to other models. It’s best for owners seeking a complete, multi-handle setup with remote management.
Pros:- Includes two handles and a complete set of hardware
- Multiple unlocking options including fingerprint, PIN, key, and app
- Remote management via WiFi and voice control compatibility
Cons:- No automatic locking sensor; door must be fully closed
- Installation involves drilling and extra screws
Best for: Homeowners with multiple exterior doors or those who want a high-coverage, multi-handle smart lock system.
Not ideal for: Users with thicker or non-standard doors, or who prefer a minimalist single-handle design with auto-lock features.
- Included Components:2 door handles, batteries, hardware, WiFi module
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi
- Control Methods:App, fingerprint, PIN, key
- Auto-Lock:No
- Installation Time:15 minutes
Our verdict“This setup is best for those wanting a multi-handle, all-in-one smart lock solution for multiple entry points.”
eufy Security Smart Lock C220, Fingerprint Keyless Entry Door Lock
The eufy C220 offers a solid balance of long battery life—up to 8 months—and multiple unlocking methods, including fingerprint, keypad, app, voice, and physical key. It excels for users who want a simple, quick install with minimal maintenance, thanks to its easy 15-minute setup. Its built-in Wi-Fi means no bridge is needed, simplifying the setup compared to models like Yale or Philips that rely on additional hubs. However, battery life can fluctuate with usage, and it lacks some advanced features like auto-lock or door sensors. This lock is ideal for users who prioritize long-term battery performance and straightforward operation within the eufy ecosystem.
Pros:- Long-lasting 8-month battery life
- Multiple unlocking options including fingerprint, keypad, app, and voice
- Easy installation with no additional bridge required
Cons:- Battery life may vary based on usage intensity
- Lacks auto-lock and door sensors
Best for: Busy homeowners or renters seeking a reliable, long-lasting, easy-to-install smart lock with multiple entry options.
Not ideal for: Those needing auto-lock or door open/close alerts, or with very high-traffic households where battery life might vary significantly.
- Battery Life:8 months
- Unlock Methods:Fingerprint, keypad, app, voice, key
- Wi-Fi:Built-in, no bridge
- Operating Temperature:-22℉ to 158℉
- Waterproof Rating:IP53
Our verdict“This lock is ideal for those wanting a dependable, low-maintenance smart lock with extended battery life and flexible access methods.”
Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint Keyless Entry Smart Lock
This lock stands out for its ultra-quick fingerprint unlock in just 0.5 seconds, making it ideal for busy households where speed matters. Compared with the Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt, which offers multiple access methods but takes slightly longer to unlock via fingerprint, the Wyze v2 prioritizes rapid entry. Its AI learning feature enhances recognition accuracy over time, reducing false rejections, but it still depends on Wi-Fi for remote management, which can be a drawback if you experience connectivity issues. The IP53 rating provides some water resistance, though not enough for heavy rain. The USB-C backup port adds reassurance during battery replacements, but users should monitor battery life, as heavy usage could drain batteries faster. Overall, this pick suits tech-savvy users who want quick, secure access with flexible unlocking options, especially if remote control isn’t their primary concern.
Pros:- Unlocks in just 0.5 seconds with fingerprint recognition
- AI learning improves recognition accuracy over time
- Multiple unlocking options including app, keypad, and backup keys
- Remote management via Wyze app for convenience
Cons:- Requires Wi-Fi connection for remote features, which can limit functionality during outages
- Battery life may vary with heavy use, requiring frequent replacements
- Limited water resistance with IP53 rating, not suitable for heavy rain
Best for: Homeowners seeking a fast, AI-optimized fingerprint lock with versatile access methods.
Not ideal for: Users in humid or heavy rain environments, since IP53 offers limited water resistance, and those needing extensive remote features without Wi-Fi dependency.
- Battery Life:8 months
- Battery Type:8 AA batteries
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi
- Material:Tempered glass
- IP Rating:IP53
- Unlock Methods:Fingerprint, app, keypad, backup keys
Our verdict“This lock is ideal for users who prioritize speed and AI-driven accuracy in a smart lock, with some reliance on Wi-Fi for remote features.”
Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle, Built-in WiFi, App Remote Control
This model makes a strong case for homeowners who want straightforward installation and multiple access options, including keypad, fingerprint, and voice control. Compared to the Wyze v2, which excels in speed and AI recognition, the Philips lock emphasizes user-friendly DIY setup and broad compatibility with voice assistants like Alexa and Google. Its auto-lock feature is customizable, but requires manual activation through the app, which could be inconvenient for some users. Battery life is decent at up to six months, but batteries are not included, adding an extra step for setup. The lock’s design is compatible with most standard doors, yet it defaults to right-opening doors, limiting flexibility for left-handed or differently configured doors. This pick suits tech-savvy homeowners who value multiple access methods and easy installation, even if auto-lock isn’t fully automatic without manual app activation.
Pros:- Easy DIY installation suitable for most doors
- Supports multiple access methods: keypad, fingerprint, app, voice
- Remote control and real-time access management via app
- Compatible with Alexa and Google Assistant for voice commands
Cons:- Batteries are not included, requiring separate purchase
- Auto-lock feature needs manual activation in the app, not fully automatic
- Designed primarily for right-opening doors, limiting flexibility
Best for: DIY-oriented homeowners wanting a multi-method, easy-to-install WiFi lock with voice assistant compatibility.
Not ideal for: Users who prefer fully automatic auto-lock without manual intervention or those with non-standard door configurations.
- Connectivity:WiFi 2.4GHz, no hub needed
- Auto-Lock:Yes, customizable 0-180 seconds
- Battery Life:Up to 6 months
- Batteries Included:No
- Fingerprint Access:Yes, unlock in 0.3 seconds
- Handle Set:Included
- Door Thickness Compatibility:1-3/8″ to 1-3/4″
Our verdict“This lock is best for homeowners seeking a flexible, easy-to-install smart lock with multiple access options and voice control, accepting some manual auto-lock steps.”
How We Picked
I ranked these locks by remote-access usefulness, everyday entry speed, installation fit, backup access, battery demands, and value. A model scored higher when its WiFi connection worked without turning routine entry into an app-dependent process. I also gave weight to keypad clarity, physical-key availability, fingerprint access, auto-lock controls, and the ease of granting temporary entry. Since a connected lock still has to function as door hardware, build design and brand support influenced the order alongside smart features.
I treated the word rated as an editorial comparison, not a simple star-count contest that can shift by retailer or listing. The Schlage leads because it has the broadest appeal with fewer compromises, while Yale earns the premium position through its polished, access-focused design. Eufy and Wyze follow because their biometric convenience and pricing suit narrower buyer groups. I separated the Philips models by package scope, giving each a role based on whether the buyer needs only a deadbolt, one matching handle, or a larger hardware set.
| rated wifi smart lock | Connectivity |
|---|---|
| Yale WiFi Smart Lock Deadbolt | Wi-Fi (2.4 & 5 GHz) |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Dead | WiFi |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | Wi-Fi 2.4GHz |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | Wi-Fi |
| eufy Security Smart Lock C220 | — |
| Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Fingerp | Wi-Fi |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt w | WiFi 2.4GHz, no hub needed |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Rated Wifi Smart Locks
The right choice depends on more than app controls or the number of entry methods. I would match the lock to the home’s door preparation, household routines, network setup, and maintenance tolerance before comparing cosmetic details. These factors can expose costs and usability differences that product listings often bury.
Built-In WiFi Versus Extra Hardware
Built-in WiFi allows remote status checks and access control without placing a separate bridge near the door. That simpler setup is appealing, but a direct wireless connection can consume batteries faster than Bluetooth-only operation. Some locks use a bridge or hub to shift network work away from the lock, which adds another device but may improve placement flexibility. I would verify that remote control works out of the box rather than assuming every app-enabled model includes it. Buyers should also check whether the lock supports a 2.4 GHz network, since many smart-home devices cannot join a 5 GHz-only setup. A weak signal at the door may cause delayed commands even when the home router works well elsewhere.
Entry Methods and Household Habits
A fingerprint reader favors households that enter frequently and want the fastest possible routine, while a keypad is easier for guests, cleaners, or contractors. Phone-only access can feel convenient until a battery dies or someone leaves the phone behind. A physical key adds another fallback, though it also preserves a conventional keyway that some buyers would rather avoid. I prefer models offering at least two independent entry methods so one failure does not leave the household relying on remote help. Buyers with children or older relatives should favor controls that require little precision and provide clear feedback. More entry methods are useful only when each one fits the people who will actually use the door.
Door Fit, Backset, and Installation Scope
Smart deadbolts are commonly advertised as easy replacements, but door alignment often matters more than the screw count. A bolt that rubs against the strike plate forces the motor to work harder, which can shorten battery life and produce false jam warnings. Before ordering, I would measure the backset, door thickness, bore diameter, and clearance around decorative trim. Buyers replacing a deadbolt and handle together should also measure the spacing between both pieces. Bundled handle sets can create a cleaner match, yet they introduce more fit variables than a deadbolt-only model. Fixing an existing alignment problem before installation will usually produce better results than expecting the lock motor to overcome it.
App Access, Codes, and Privacy
The most useful app feature is often not remote locking but temporary code management. Time-limited or recurring codes let a buyer separate family access from service-provider access and remove permissions without changing every household code. I would check how many codes the app supports, whether activity history identifies each code, and whether alerts can be adjusted to avoid constant notifications. Account recovery and two-step verification also deserve attention because the lock app controls a physical entry point. Compatibility with a preferred voice assistant is helpful, but automatic routines require restraint when they can affect door security. A smaller, well-organized feature set can be easier to live with than a crowded app that hides common controls.
Battery Maintenance and Long-Term Cost
Battery claims rarely reflect every household because WiFi strength, entry frequency, weather, and bolt friction all affect runtime. Cold conditions can reduce battery performance, while a misaligned door can make every locking cycle more demanding. I would favor clear low-battery warnings and an exterior emergency-power method when a model lacks a physical key. Rechargeable cells may seem economical, but buyers should follow the maker’s battery guidance because voltage behavior differs from standard alkaline batteries. The purchase price also tells only part of the story; replacement batteries, optional hubs, and possible subscription features shape long-term value. Paying more makes sense when the lock reduces maintenance or offers access controls the household will use weekly, not merely once during setup.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a WiFi smart lock better than a Bluetooth-only smart lock?
A WiFi smart lock is better for remote control, status checks, access alerts, and code changes while away from home. Bluetooth-only models can be simpler and may use less battery, but their connected functions usually require the phone to remain nearby. A separate bridge can give a Bluetooth lock remote access, though that adds cost and another device to configure. I would choose WiFi for rentals, frequent visitors, or households that regularly need off-site control. For one-person homes where local keypad entry is enough, Bluetooth may be the lower-maintenance choice.
Should I choose fingerprint entry or a keypad?
Fingerprint entry is faster for residents who use the same door every day, but recognition can be affected by wet, dirty, or injured fingers. A keypad works for nearly anyone and makes temporary guest access easier because no biometric enrollment is needed. Families may benefit from a lock such as the eufy C220 that combines both methods. I would not select a fingerprint model unless it also offers a reliable backup method, such as a code, app, or key. For rentals and service access, the keypad is usually the more flexible priority.
Do I need a smart lock with a physical key?
A physical key provides a familiar mechanical fallback when batteries, electronics, or phone access fail. Key-free models remove the keyway and can simplify access management, but every household member must be comfortable using codes, fingerprints, or emergency power. I favor keyed backup for buyers who travel often, share the home with less technical users, or lack another entrance. Buyers who dislike carrying keys may still leave the backup key with a trusted person. The better choice depends on whether redundancy or key-free simplicity matters more.
Will a WiFi smart lock fit my existing door?
Many models fit standard deadbolt openings, but standard does not mean universal. Measure the bore hole, backset, door thickness, and available interior space before buying. Decorative trim, storm doors, narrow frames, and unusual multipoint locking systems can cause conflicts. A handle bundle requires extra measurements because the handle position and mounting holes must match the door. I would also test whether the current bolt moves freely with the door closed, since poor alignment can drain batteries and trigger jams.
Is it worth paying more for Schlage or Yale?
Paying more makes sense when a buyer values established lock design, polished controls, and long-term support over the lowest purchase price. Schlage is the stronger all-around choice here, while Yale suits buyers willing to pay for a more premium access experience. Eufy and Wyze can deliver better feature value when fingerprint entry or budget carries more weight than brand history. The price gap is harder to justify for a lightly used secondary door where basic remote control is enough. I would spend more on the main entrance and use a lower-cost model for secondary access when the household needs several locks.
Conclusion
For the broadest mix of connected control and familiar door hardware, my best overall pick is the Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt. The Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 is the best value choice for buyers prioritizing fingerprint entry at a lower price, while the Yale WiFi Smart Lock earns the premium role. Beginners should start with the standard Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt because its deadbolt-only format keeps the project focused. The eufy Security Smart Lock C220 makes the most sense for families wanting fingerprint-first daily access backed by other entry methods. For coordinated hardware, I would choose the Philips deadbolt with one handle for a single-entry makeover or the two-handle package when more matching pieces are needed. Buyers should confirm each Philips package’s exact contents and measurements because the similar names hide meaningful installation differences. That division gives every model a clear buyer: Schlage for balance, Yale for premium appeal, Wyze for savings, eufy for biometrics, and Philips for straightforward replacements or matching handle sets.
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
